AWS Workspaces vs. Azure Virtual Desktop (AVD)

Those working in the IT department in early 2020 can well recall their manager telling them that the enterprise is going entirely remote shortly. They were also told to prepare for this shift. For IT teams, it’s certainly nothing short of a challenge.

Questions like ‘Will they be able to fulfill the hardware and software needs of the employees’ race in their heads. Working with a cloud provider to give virtual desktop infrastructure to your staff is an effective way to resolve these cloud enablement problems.

An Azure virtual desktop provider that gives an end-to-end implementation and management of your Azure virtual desktop environment allows end-users to experience no business disruption. It also leads to greater application availability. 

The Definition of a Virtual Desktop

Options like Azure and AWS can be utilized to deliver virtual desktops to workers who have the programs they require either pre-installed or given as needed.

But you cannot only deploy a virtual machine and think it to be a virtual desktop. The virtual desktop infrastructure solution is the one that is scalable, secure, and easy to use. 

Comparison between AVD and AWS Workspaces

When deciding between AVD and AWS, it’s essential to closely compare various aspects of both products and then decide on the best option.


With AWS workspaces, every individual receives their personal desktop that can be either Linux OS or Windows. On the other hand, in AVD, Windows is the only option.

People can have either their desktop or a group of people can share and collaborate on a virtual machine. When people share and collaborate on a single device, it helps cut costs and minimize virtual machine count.

Another crucial factor is that AWS workspaces Windows offers Server 2016. To work on Windows 10 on AWS workspaces, you require the relevant licensing and at least 200 workspaces in every region.


The next step is to compare the pricing of both products. Suppose you plan to create virtual desktops for a department having ten users. In that case, you will require a 2 virtual CPU machine having 8GB RAM and Windows operating system.

With these requirements, you will notice that it will cost $47 per month. For ten users, it will amount to $470 per month. You can look at the cost of AVD in two ways. First, where every user receives their personal machine, and the second, where users share (pooled) a virtual machine.

A D2_v4 virtual machine having VCPUs and 8GB RAM will cost $80 per month for every user. But you also need to consider the licensing.

Suppose every user will utilize MS 365 premium subscription, which costs $20 per user per month. The overall cost will be $100 for ten users every month. It ultimately comes to $1000 per month in total.


Both AWS and AVD perform almost the same through the native remote applications. With AVD, there’s a lesser delay in opening applications and programs than AWS. 

On the reliability front, AWS workspaces provide a 99.9 percent uptime SLA. AVD, on the contrary, endeavors to achieve 99.9 percent availability. Microsoft does not give an SLS agreement that is backed financially. So, if you require an SLA, then you can go ahead with AWS workspaces.

After considering the various aspects, you should choose the one based on your situation. For instance, if you want to give a Linux Desktop, then use AWS Workspaces. But if you require Windows 10 for 100 to 150 users, then AVD is the right option.

It’s essential to work with an Azure virtual desktop provider who monitors your AWD environment proactively. It helps in the resolution of a large number of incidents before they even happen.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *